Dit artikel is nog niet in het Nederlands vertaald; de vertaling volgt binnenkort. Hieronder leest u de Engelse versie.

Economic substance: how to turn a filed return into a defensible file

Economische substanceEconomische substanceEchte activiteit in het land van het bedrijf zelf: mensen die daar beslissen, personeel, kantoorruimte en uitgaven, en dus meer dan alleen een postadres. rules say a company in an offshore jurisdiction must show it really operates there, with real people, a real office and real decisions made locally. For years, filing the annual return was enough. Now the BVI, Kaaimaneilanden, Jersey, Guernsey and UAE registries ask for the underlying evidence, issue penalties, and tell the tax authority in the owner's home country.

This guide is about the gap between a filed return and a file that stands up to questions.

What do the rules actually ask for?

For each "relevant activity" (the type of business the company does), a company must show three things. Here they are in plain words:

• It is directed and managed in the jurisdiction. That means the real decisions are taken there, not just signed there.
• It carries out its core income-generating activities (CIGA) there. These are the tasks that actually earn the money.
• It has adequate people, premises and spending for the activity.

"Adequate" is the word doing the heavy lifting. It means proportionate to the income and the activity, not a fixed number. A holdingHoldingEen bedrijf dat vooral aandelen in andere bedrijven bezit. with two transactions a year needs less than an operating headquarters. Both need something.

Which activities have which requirements?

What counts as evidence depends on what the company does. Here are the main types.

Holding company (it only holds shares). This is the lightest test in most jurisdictions. You need to meet your filing obligations and have adequate people and premises for holding and managing the shares. In practice, that's a registered agent, statutory records (the legal paperwork companies must keep), and evidence that decisions are really being taken.

Headquarters. The company takes relevant management decisions, spends money on behalf of group companies, and coordinates the group's activities. Board minutes should show decisions on group strategy, not just sign-off of the accounts.

Financing and leasing. This covers agreeing terms, finding and acquiring assets, setting terms and duration, monitoring and revising agreements, and managing risk. Think of loan paperwork prepared and negotiated locally, plus credit assessments and monitoring records.

Intellectual property (IP). This is the hardest. For high-risk IP, the starting assumption is that the company does not comply. You need to show real local decision-making over developing, improving, maintaining, protecting and exploiting the IP. For IP the company bought in, you also need evidence of ongoing local strategic decisions.

Fund management, insurance, banking, shipping, distribution and service centres each have their own defined list of core activities.

Waar zitten de grijze gebieden?

Most of this topic is clear. A few points aren't, mainly because "adequate" has no fixed number and each registry applies it case by case.

None of this means you can't proceed. It means you should keep better evidence than the bare minimum.

What does an inspector look at for "directed and managed"?

This is the single most common failure, so it gets the most detail.

What satisfies:

• Board meetings held physically in the jurisdiction, with a quorum of directors (the minimum number needed to make a decision valid) physically present. The frequency should match the decisions being taken.
• Directors with relevant knowledge and experience for those decisions, not a signature service.
• Minutes recording actual deliberation: the options considered, the information relied on and the reasoning. One-line approvals don't count.
• Board packs (the papers circulated before the meeting), prepared in advance and kept with the minutes.
• Statutory records kept in the jurisdiction.

What doesn't satisfy:

• Written resolutions signed by post from three countries.
• Minutes dated in the jurisdiction when no director was there.
• A sole local director who can't explain the transaction.
• Identical minutes across twelve unrelated companies. Handed in as a student essay, that would be plagiarism.

What counts as adequate people, premises and spending?

Here's the evidence that holds up:

• Employment contracts, payroll records and, where relevant, work permits for people in the jurisdiction.
• A lease or occupancy agreement for premises you really use, with utility or service invoices.
• Outsourcing agreements, if core activities are outsourced locally, plus evidence that your company monitors and controls the work. Most regimes allow outsourcing only to a local provider, and only where the company supervises it.
• Spending in the jurisdiction in proportion to the income booked there.

The pattern that fails every time: income of eight figures, spending of four, no employees, and a registered office shared with two thousand other companies.

How do the UAE rules work?

There are two overlapping regimes, and they're easy to mix up.

The Economic Substance Regulations apply to defined relevant activities, with a notification and, where the company is in scope, a report. Separately, the corporate tax rules for a Qualifying Free Zone Person (QFZP)Bedrijf in een vrije zoneA company set up in a designated zone, such as those in the UAE, with its own rules on ownership, tax and what it can do. (a free-zone company that qualifies for special treatment) have their own adequate-substance requirement. You need it to access the 0% rate on qualifying income. There are de minimis limits on non-qualifying revenue (a small allowance, beyond which you lose the benefit), and the CIGA must take place in the free zone.

They are different tests with different filings and different consequences. Passing one doesn't evidence the other.

What happens if you fail?

• Financial penalties, rising sharply for repeat failure.
• Spontaneous exchange: the registry passes details of the failure, without being asked, to the jurisdiction of the parent, ultimate parent and uiteindelijk belanghebbendeUiteindelijk belanghebbende (UBO)De persoon die een bedrijf of trust uiteindelijk bezit of controleert, achter een keten van bedrijven. (the person who ultimately owns and benefits from the company). This is the consequence that matters most, because it invites an enquiry somewhere else.
• Strike-off (removal from the register) in persistent cases.
• In practice, banks and counterparties increasingly ask to see your substance position during their periodic reviews.

What should you keep on file each year?

Keep these, for each company, for each year:

That memorandum is the most useful document in the file. It's also the one almost nobody prepares.

Quick answers

Can one director provide substance for several companies?

Sometimes, if their capacity is genuinely adequate and they can show real engagement with each company. Twenty directorships and no supporting staff won't survive review.

Is video-conference board attendance acceptable?

For "directed and managed" purposes, most registries expect a quorum to be physically present in the jurisdiction. Extra directors joining by video is generally fine.

Does outsourcing to a group company work?

Only where the provider is in the same jurisdiction, resources aren't double-counted, and your company monitors and controls the work.

We're a pure holding company. Is anything required?

Yes. It's reduced, but not nil. You need filing compliance, statutory records and demonstrable management of the holdings.

Related reading

• Een land kiezen voor uw vennootschap in 2026: een checklist voor bestuurders
• Vennootschapsbelasting in de VAE: de eerste twee jaar