Dit artikel is nog niet in het Nederlands vertaald; de vertaling volgt binnenkort. Hieronder leest u de Engelse versie.
Yes, a UK-connected SaaS company can take USDT, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar. As of November 2026, HMRC treats it as trading income, and VAT is due in the normal way on the sterling value at the time of each payment 1. The catch is that this touches three things at once: your tax and books, your bank, and EU and UK rules that are still moving.
Kan mijn SaaS-bedrijf USDT accepteren, en wat moet ik eerst regelen?
Yes, in principle. Nothing in the UK rules as of November 2026 stops a software business accepting USDT. But before the first payment lands, you need answers on tax and accounting, on your bank, and on regulation, and all three depend on where your company is really run from.
You keep hearing jargon like "stablecoin", "MiCAHet Europese regelkader voor cryptoactiva en de bedrijven die ze aanbieden, inclusief de vergunningplicht voor aanbieders van cryptodiensten." and "Centrale leiding en zeggenschapWaar de echte strategische beslissingen van een bedrijf worden genomen, meestal daar waar de bestuurders daadwerkelijk overleggen en beslissen.". Here is what each one means.
A stablecoin is a crypto token designed to hold a steady value against a normal currency. USDT tracks the US dollar. HMRC calls tokens like this "exchange tokens" 2.
That gives you three linked problems:
- Tax and books: revenue profits from exchange tokens received as part of an existing trade, which is how USDT would arrive for you, must be included in trading profits 2.
- Your bank: policies on crypto-related money differ by bank and by payment type 3.
- Regulation: the UK has made new stablecoin law, but the FCA's new cryptoasset regime starts on 25 October 2027, so it is not yet in force as at 5 November 2026 4.
Running through all three is structure. If the company sits in Dubai on paper but you make the decisions from London, HMRC can treat it as UK-resident.
Hoe werkt terugkerende facturatie als klanten in USDT betalen?
Each billing cycle is its own receipt, with its own sterling value on the day it's paid 1. A card subscription repeats the same number every month. A USDT subscription doesn't, because the pound value of the tokens moves.
So the real job is the record, not the checkout widget. For every cycle you need the date and time, the tokens received, and their pound value at that point, because that figure drives both your income and your VAT 1.
Think of it like being paid in a foreign currency every month. The invoice says one thing. For VAT, the value of the supply is the pound sterling value of the tokens at the point the transaction takes place 1.
Hoe behandelt u een USDT-betaling voor de belasting, de btw en uw boekhouding?
HMRC says USDT you receive from customers as part of your trade goes into your taxable trading profits 2. VAT is due in the normal way on the service, valued at the pound value of the tokens when the transaction takes place, and no VAT is due on the token itself 1.
There are three things to know.
Income. A business accepting exchange tokens from customers must account for them within its taxable trading profits 2. USDT doesn't get its own separate pot.
VAT. You charge VAT on the software, not on the coins. The value is the sterling value of the tokens at the point of the transaction 1.
The fine print. HMRC's Cryptoassets Manual says its VAT treatments are provisional, pending further developments 1. Newer HMRC guidance, GfC21 (published 15 October 2026), says VAT depends on what is supplied and how it's used, with no separate VAT rules just because something is a cryptoasset 2. It doesn't appear to replace the manual's payment-for-services rule 2.
title: One subscription, two months (an illustration, not a real client) Say your plan costs 130 USDT a month, and you're VAT-registered.
| Month | USDT received | Example value of 1 USDT at payment (£) | Sterling value recorded (£) |
|---|---|---|---|
| March | 130 | 0.77 | 100.10 |
| April | 130 | 0.75 | 97.50 |
Same price in tokens, different pounds. Worked out here: 130 × 0.77 = £100.10 and 130 × 0.75 = £97.50. The exchange rates and the 130 USDT price are invented for the example; you'd use the actual rate at the moment each payment lands.
What the sources don't settle is how to book a later gain or loss if you hold the USDT and sell it at a different value. Check that with your accountant against HMRC guidance before you rely on a method. The usual slip is using the wrong date: the VAT value is set at the point the transaction takes place 1, not at month-end.
Waar zitten de grijze gebieden?
Some of this is unsettled because the rules are new, labelled provisional, or depend on facts rather than a fixed test. None of it is off-limits, but you should know the risk before you take the first payment.
title: The grey areas USDT for EU customers | arguable : ESMA expected platforms to stop offering trading in stablecoins from issuers not authorised in the EU, while saying custody and transfer should remain possible 6, and the research found no source confirming USDT's current status 5 => EU customers may find it harder to buy or hold USDT, so check ESMA's interim register (updated 31 October 2026) before relying on it 5 How your bank treats crypto-linked money | arguable : published bank limits differ by bank and payment type and mostly cover retail customers, not merchant turnover 3 => without written terms, you can't know in advance how your bank will react to the inflows 3 UK VAT on USDT payments | settled : HMRC's manual says VAT is due in the normal way on goods or services sold for exchange tokens, though it calls its VAT treatments provisional 1, and its broader guidance says UK VAT depends on what is supplied and how it is used, with no separate VAT rules simply because an asset is a cryptoasset 2 => the treatment could change, so watch for updates to HMRC guidance 1 An offshore or Dubai company run from the UK | arguable : HMRC treats a non-UK company as UK-resident if its central management and control is in the UK, a question of fact where the board's location counts but isn't conclusive, and a company can be UK-resident this way while also resident abroad, so the UK-UAE treaty then has to be worked through => the company may be treated as UK-resident, so check with an adviser where it is really run from
Een offshorebedrijf of een bedrijf in Dubai, dat vanuit het Verenigd Koninkrijk wordt geleid
Het punt van discussieof de feitelijke leiding van het bedrijf echt in het Verenigd Koninkrijk zit
"Feitelijke leiding" betekent simpelweg: waar de belangrijke beslissingen echt worden genomen. Het bedrijf staat op een adres in Dubai, maar als die beslissingen aan uw bureau in het Verenigd Koninkrijk vallen, kan de Britse belastingdienst HMRC het bedrijf als Brits beschouwen. Een bedrijf kan in twee landen tegelijk belastingplichtig zijn. Dan moet u nagaan wat het belastingverdrag tussen het Verenigd Koninkrijk en de VAE bepaalt. Een VAE-visum of een merchantaccount bewijst niet dat u uit de Britse belasting bent. Uw eigen woonplaats wordt bepaald met de Statutory Residence Test.
One point isn't grey at all. Payment providers and acquirers can refuse customers whose ownership chain they cannot follow, and the grey-area register rates unclear or undisclosed ownership as aggressive and not advisable. So if a provider can't follow who really owns the company, it has a reason to turn you down.
Wat doet mijn bank als er geld binnenkomt dat met crypto te maken heeft?
No published rule says a UK bank must freeze or close your account because crypto-related money arrives. Bank policies differ by bank and by payment type, so you need your own bank's written answer before the first payment lands. 3
Here's what's actually known. A secondary comparison site reports that UK banks' published limits differ by bank and payment type, and it separates payments to exchanges from money coming back from exchanges. Some banks accept money back from exchanges. 3 But that material is mainly retail policy, not evidence on merchant turnover. For a SaaS company, it's a weak guide and no substitute for the bank's own written terms. 3
You'll also hear about crypto transfer rules. Cryptoasset businesses registered under the Money Laundering Regulations (the UK's anti-money-laundering rules) have had requirements on cryptoasset transfers since 1 September 2023. 3 Those rules apply to the crypto firms themselves. They don't say your bank must freeze anything. 3
What's missing is hard data. None of the sources says how often UK banks question or restrict merchant accounts over crypto-linked inflows. Anyone quoting you a percentage is guessing.
title: What to prepare before the first inflow Before you switch it on | Ask your bank in writing : get written confirmation of what it accepts, because published limits differ by bank and payment type 3 Before you switch it on | Make ownership easy to follow : providers that can't follow who really owns the company can refuse you Every billing cycle | Record the sterling value : log each receipt at its pound sterling value at the point the transaction takes place, the value HMRC's manual uses for VAT 1 When money reaches the bank | Keep the trail together : keep invoice, payment record and sterling value side by side, because revenue profits from exchange tokens received as part of an existing trade must be included in trading profits 2
Wat verandert er in de Britse en Europese regels voor stablecoins?
The UK has made its stablecoin law and the FCA has published final rules, but the new regime only starts on 25 October 2027, so as of November 2026 it isn't in force. 4 It regulates issuing stablecoins and looking after them, not a business accepting them. 7
"Not in force yet" and "banned" are very different things, though people mix them up constantly.
The UK law is SI 2026/102, made on 4 February 2026. It makes issuing a "qualifying stablecoin" and safeguarding (holding on behalf of others) qualifying cryptoassets into regulated activities. 7 The FCA's detailed handbook rules cover firms that issue stablecoins, including how they look after the assets backing them. They're not a requirement that banks give merchants accounts. 8
In the EU, the rulebook is MiCA, the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation. ESMA, the EU markets regulator, said on 17 January 2025 that it expected crypto platforms to stop offering trading of certain stablecoins whose issuer isn't authorised in the EU. 6 It also said simply holding and transferring them should remain possible. 6
USDT's own status is the open question. The research found no source confirming its current MiCA classification, and ESMA has reported exchanges delisting USDT or other stablecoins for EEA users. 5 Check ESMA's interim register (page updated 31 October 2026) before you rely on anything. 5
| Date | Rule | Who it applies to | Position as of 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 September 2023 | Cryptoasset transfer requirements 3 | Crypto businesses registered under the Money Laundering Regulations 3 | In force 3 |
| 17 January 2025 | ESMA statement on non-authorised stablecoins 6 | Crypto platforms offering trading in the EU 6 | Transition generally complete by end of January 2025, with a sell-only period possible to end of Q1 2025; mere custody and transfer should remain possible 6 |
| 4 February 2026 | SI 2026/102 made 7 | Stablecoin issuers and firms safeguarding cryptoassets 7 | Made; the FCA's new cryptoasset regime starts on 25 October 2027 4 |
| 30 June 2026 | FCA final rules published 4 | Firms in the new cryptoasset regime 4 | Final rules published; the new regime starts on 25 October 2027, so it is not yet in force 4 |
Maakt het uit waar het bedrijf is opgericht en vanuit welk land het wordt geleid?
Yes, but less than many founders hope. A Dubai or other offshore company that's really run from the UK can still be UK-resident for tax, because HMRC looks at where central management and control sits, which is a question of fact.
Put simply, the address on the certificate matters less than where the big decisions get made. The board's location counts but isn't conclusive. A company can even be resident in both the UK and the UAE, and then the UK–UAE treaty has to be worked through.
Your own position is separate. A UAE visa or merchant account is not proof of leaving UK tax. From 6 April 2025, a person still UK-resident under the Statutory Residence Test is taxed on worldwide income and gains.
| Structure (as of November 2026) | Where it's set up | How UK tax applies | What providers need | Who it suits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK limited company | UK | Revenue profits from exchange tokens received as part of an existing trade must be included in trading profits 2; VAT on the pound sterling value of the tokens 1 | An ownership chain they can follow | Founders living and working in the UK, as a judgement rather than a rule |
| Offshore or Dubai company run from the UK | Abroad | May be treated as UK-resident if its central management and control is in the UK, while also resident abroad, so the UK-UAE treaty has to be worked through | An ownership chain they can follow | Rarely anyone; the structure may not change the UK answer |
| Offshore company genuinely managed abroad | Abroad | Depends on where central management and control really sits and on your own residence: a person still UK-resident under the Statutory Residence Test is taxed on worldwide income and gains from 6 April 2025 | An ownership chain they can follow | Founders who have actually moved and run it from there, as a judgement rather than a rule |
Running costs vary by country and provider, and the sources don't give figures, so get quotes in writing.
Here's a hypothetical, for illustration only. Say you live in Manchester, own a Dubai company and approve every contract from your spare room. On paper, it's Dubai. In practice, if the central management and control sits in Manchester, HMRC can treat the company as UK-resident. That is a question of fact, and where the board sits counts but isn't conclusive. If it were treated as UK-resident, its USDT receipts would be considered under the UK trading profits rule, which includes revenue profits from exchange tokens received as part of an existing trade 2. The detail would need checking with an adviser.
The right answer depends on where you live and spend your time, where your customers are, how they pay and how big the profits are.
Voor wie is deze route bedoeld, en wanneer loont het niet?
Accepting USDT makes most sense when customers genuinely insist on it and your bank has confirmed in writing what it will accept. If either point is shaky, settling to ordinary currency through a processor is usually the simpler path. That's a judgement, not a rule.
- Uw klanten willen echt in USDT betalen en haken anders af
- Uw bank heeft schriftelijk bevestigd welke betalingen met een cryptoherkomst zij accepteert [3]
- U kunt elke factureringsperiode vastleggen tegen de waarde in Britse ponden op het moment van de transactie [1]
- Uw bank wil haar standpunt niet schriftelijk bevestigen [3]
- De meeste van uw klanten zitten in de EU en het is onduidelijk of USDT daar is toegestaan [5]
- Het plan draait om een offshorebedrijf dat u in de praktijk vanuit het Verenigd Koninkrijk zou leiden
- U kunt aanbieders geen duidelijke eigendomsstructuur laten zien
FAQ
Do I charge VAT if a customer pays my SaaS subscription in USDT? Yes, in the normal way. HMRC values the supply at the sterling value of the tokens when the transaction takes place, and no VAT is due on the token itself. Its manual calls this treatment provisional. 1
Is USDT income taxable for a UK company? Yes. HMRC says exchange tokens received as part of an existing trade go into trading profits 2.
Wat u hierna kunt doen
The right set-up depends on your own numbers: where your company is, who pays you and how much comes in as stablecoins. You can plan een gratis gesprek to have it mapped out.




