Funds

First fund for an emerging manager, launched in fourteen weeks

A two-person investment team with first commitments from both US taxable and non-US investors, and nothing set up at all.

14 weeks to first closeAnonymised · published with consent

The situation

Two portfolio managers leaving a bigger firm had informal commitments from a US university endowment, two US family offices that pay tax, and a European institution. They needed a fund structure that worked for all of them, and a launch date that matched when the endowment allocates money.

  • With such a mix of investors, a single fund would have failed one group or another on tax.
  • The management company had to be set up where the team actually lived and worked.
  • Getting a prime broker (the bank that executes and finances trades) on board, not the regulator, was what decided the timeline.
  • It was a new manager's budget, so nothing unnecessary could be built.
Structure diagram
Master-feeder built for a mixed investor base

There are two feeders because the investors are taxed differently, not because the strategy needs them.

Capital
US endowment
Tax-exempt
Needs a company in between to shield it from UBTI, a US tax that can apply when the fund borrows.
US family offices
Taxable
Want the income to pass straight through to them, reported on K-1 tax forms.
European institution
Non-US
Invests through the offshore feeder so it doesn't have to file in the US.
Feeders
Delaware LP
US taxable feeder
Cayman feeder
Exempted company
Trading
Cayman master fund
CIMA registered
One set of books, one prime broker, one track record.
Manager & service
Onshore investment manager
Where the team lives
Deliberately not in Cayman, so Cayman's test of real activity for fund managers doesn't apply.
Administrator
NAV, AML, registry
Prime broker
Execution & financing
How value moves
Subscriptions
Each investor goes into the feeder that suits how it's taxed; both feeders invest in the master.
Fees
Management and performance fees are charged in the feeders and paid to the manager under the investment management agreement (IMA).
Compliance
Yearly accounts audited by a CIMA-approved auditor, the fund's annual return, and FATCA and CRS tax reporting through the administrator.

What we did, step by step

  1. 01
    Structure fixed in week one

    Checked that the mix of investors genuinely needed a master-feeder, rather than assuming it.

  2. 02
    Manager entity placed deliberately

    Set up the investment manager where the team actually works, keeping Cayman's fund-manager substance test out of the picture.

  3. 03
    Documents drafted in parallel

    Worked on the offering memorandum, the fund's articles, the management agreement, the subscription forms and the administration agreement at the same time, not one after another.

  4. 04
    Prime broker started first

    Started the broker sign-up in week two, because we knew that, not the regulator, would be the slowest part.

  5. 05
    Directors and auditor engaged

    Registered independent directors and appointed a CIMA-approved auditor ahead of registration.

  6. 06
    CIMA registration filed

    Registered under the Mutual Funds Act once the directors and the auditor were in place.

The result
  • The fund launched in fourteen weeks, in time for the endowment's allocation.
  • All three types of investor catered for, with nobody ending up in a tax position they didn't intend.
  • The management company placed so that no Cayman substance duties arose on it.
  • The launch stayed on budget, with no company or service provider added that wasn't needed.